THE NEWSLETTER FOR "EVALUATING OPEN ACCESS"
Send us your posts by email
https://evaluatingoa.blogspot.
Recent Posts
-------------------
1) Prof. Paul N Edwards, Stanford University, Program in Science,
Technology & Society, Director says about Open Access Publishing
Commerce and the Scientific Ethos
More Details: https://evaluatingoa.blogspot.
2) Elsevier published 6 fake journals!
Elsevier published 6 fake journals
https://www.the-scientist.com/
Scientific publishing giant Elsevier put out a total of six
publications between 2000 and 2005 that were sponsored by unnamed
pharmaceutical companies and looked like peer reviewed medical
journals
More Details: https://evaluatingoa.blogspot.
3) Caution with the continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open
access publishing lists. Reliance on Beall’s lists is flawed
December 01, 2020
Professor Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Caution with the continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open
access publishing lists. Reliance on Beall’s lists is flawed
http://amj.amegroups.com/artic
See more http://amj.amegroups.com/artic
4) The Scientific Output of Iran: Quantity, Quality, and Corruption.
Corrupted Publishers.
https://evaluatingoa.blogspot.
5) Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: they are
biased, flawed, opaque and inaccurate
https://bibliothecae.unibo.it/
Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: they are biased, flawed,
opaque and inaccurate According this publication the Jeffrey Beall's
list is useless
and misleading https://bibliothecae.unibo.it/
Abstract A commentary published in «Nature» by Jeffrey Beall called
for the ban of “predatory” journals
from the scientific record. That call for a ban was deeply flawed
since the lists on which the term “predatory” were based, were
themselves flawed.
Many papers published in such journals are valid, having been peer
reviewed, and acting
in an academically responsible manner, making Beall’s call unfair, and
discriminatory.
Beall’s blog served as a useful alert system, but in no way were
Beall’s black lists,
which failed to indicate precise inclusion criteria for each entry,
validated by scholars around
the globe, much less suitable for use in any policy-making.
Even though the Beall blog suddenly went blank on January 15, 2017,
with no explanation to the publ
6) How reliable is the Beall's List of predatory journals?
-------------------
How reliable is the Beall's List of predatory journals?
I have seen many journals which are indexed in DOAJ, Scopus, EconLit,
etc but listed under predatory
journals by Beall's list. I think papers which are indexed in Scopus,
for example, are not predatory. I need clarification on the
reliability of Beall's
list of predatory journals.
https://www.researchgate.net/p
Send us your posts by email
https://evaluatingoa.blogspot.
Comments
Post a Comment